Rocker arm ratio from factory -hmmmm

Talk about modifications, or anything else associated with performance enhancements. Have a new idea for performance/reliability? Post it here. No idea is stupid! (please use Detailing and Appearance for cosmetic ideas)
Post Reply
User avatar
olblueeyesbonne
Retired Moderator
Retired Moderator
Posts: 6146
Joined: Wed May 21, 2008 9:44 pm
Year and Trim: 99 SSEi
01 SLE
02 GTP40th
02 SSEi
06 GP GT
Location: Sauk Centre, MN
Contact:

Rocker arm ratio from factory -hmmmm

Post by olblueeyesbonne »

Was reading on CGP how some GTP's have been found to have as much of a ration as 1.8 on their original rocker arms and I'm wondering if mine might possibly be that high, thus helping to understand how my car can pull so well up top, and overall.
A few people have been wondering how my car is capable of times and speeds that have mainly been acheived by cars with high ratio rockers or one or two other mods, none of which I had on my car at the time of the 13.xxx runs.

How does one go about checking the ratio of their rockers? I am probably going to put the HS 1.9's next week and would like to check the stock rockers if I can before I get rid of them.
Last edited by olblueeyesbonne on Thu Oct 02, 2008 8:51 pm, edited 1 time in total.
DHP Powrtuner & Tech 2
1998 GTP Coupe
1999 SSEi 70k miles
2000 Silverado 2500 Ext Cab 4x4/6.0L/4L80E
2000 Trans Am WS6 LQ3 (LQ4 w/LS3 top end) 4L60E
2001 SLE
2002 Monte Carlo SS Top-swapped FSIC Gen V TOG's, Mezeire.....
2002 GTP 40th Anniv Ed Coupe
2004 GTP Comp G 'Bottom-swapped'
PDXGTP
Posts like an LG3
Posts like an LG3
Posts: 347
Joined: Wed Jun 18, 2008 12:52 am
Year and Trim: 1998 Pontiac Grand Prix GTP

Re: Rocker arm ratio from factory -hmmmm

Post by PDXGTP »

So I'd like to say don't get rid of your stock rockers, valve springs or pushrods. Also keep the rocker ped with the set. You never know when your going to need them. Try to keep them all oiled sloppy and wet, in a ziplock bag.
Iknow that the ratio is determined by how far the pushrod seat is to the trunion. The closer to the trunion, the higher the ratio, valve opens sooner and stays open longer.

Are you changing your springs?
Sorry, didn't look at your sig before posting .. your motor.
Best 60' = 1.716
Best ET = 12.186
Best MPH = 112.98
Image
Dirthead Racing
SSE Member
SSE Member
Posts: 107
Joined: Fri Jun 13, 2008 4:45 pm
Year and Trim: 97 ssei
12.67@103

Re: Rocker arm ratio from factory -hmmmm

Post by Dirthead Racing »

Times after 1.9RR's go on should be a good indicator. I suspect you have 1.9 mod'd rockers and don't know it because they don't look any different than stock ones. That would justify your 98mph trap speed.
User avatar
olblueeyesbonne
Retired Moderator
Retired Moderator
Posts: 6146
Joined: Wed May 21, 2008 9:44 pm
Year and Trim: 99 SSEi
01 SLE
02 GTP40th
02 SSEi
06 GP GT
Location: Sauk Centre, MN
Contact:

Re: Rocker arm ratio from factory -hmmmm

Post by olblueeyesbonne »

Dirthead Racing wrote:Times after 1.9RR's go on should be a good indicator. I suspect you have 1.9 mod'd rockers and don't know it because they don't look any different than stock ones. That would justify your 98mph trap speed.

How about the 99.1x-99.67 mph runs? :wink: :???:

That is a good point on the post RR install times, but I've got the ported SC, 3.3", Ceramic coated P-log, and fine tune all going on between now and Oct. 18 and/or 19 when I head to the track for the last time this year.

I've also got a pair of slicks coming again (just waiting for the QTP owner to clarify he's ok with me running them again while he's @ college in IL).
DHP Powrtuner & Tech 2
1998 GTP Coupe
1999 SSEi 70k miles
2000 Silverado 2500 Ext Cab 4x4/6.0L/4L80E
2000 Trans Am WS6 LQ3 (LQ4 w/LS3 top end) 4L60E
2001 SLE
2002 Monte Carlo SS Top-swapped FSIC Gen V TOG's, Mezeire.....
2002 GTP 40th Anniv Ed Coupe
2004 GTP Comp G 'Bottom-swapped'
User avatar
agrazela
Retired Gearhead
Retired Gearhead
Posts: 1808
Joined: Thu May 22, 2008 11:28 am
Year and Trim: 04 Lesabre, Stock
98 Lesabre, Retired
Location: San Diego, CA

Re: Rocker arm ratio from factory -hmmmm

Post by agrazela »

Dirthead Racing wrote:Times after 1.9RR's go on should be a good indicator. I suspect you have 1.9 mod'd rockers and don't know it because they don't look any different than stock ones. That would justify your 98mph trap speed.
ol' blue,

After you take them off, post pics of the pushrod sockets on your "stock" rockers and the "stock" pedestals and we'll see if they are modified stockers.
Last edited by agrazela on Tue Oct 07, 2008 1:22 am, edited 2 times in total.
2004 Buick Lesabre Limited, Gran Touring
Bone Stock

1998 Buick Lesabre Limited, Gran Touring
Retired
Foghorn
SLE Member
SLE Member
Posts: 41
Joined: Thu Sep 11, 2008 9:16 pm
Year and Trim: 1997 SSEi 40th Anniversary
13.07 @ 106.5

Re: Rocker arm ratio from factory -hmmmm

Post by Foghorn »

1.8 on stock rockers is myth. There was some dispute at to whether later models had 1.66:1 versus 1.60:1. This may be explained more by production tolerances and measuring techniques than anything else.

There's nothing unusual about your trap speeds. When I had similar mods I did similar times to yours with even slightly higher trap speeds.

Cheers,
2003 SSEi
Posts like an L67
Posts like an L67
Posts: 1382
Joined: Fri Aug 01, 2008 11:57 am
Year and Trim: 2003 SSEi.

LOTS of Mods

Re: Rocker arm ratio from factory -hmmmm

Post by 2003 SSEi »

Foghorn wrote:1.8 on stock rockers is myth. There was some dispute at to whether later models had 1.66:1 versus 1.60:1. This may be explained more by production tolerances and measuring techniques than anything else.

There's nothing unusual about your trap speeds. When I had similar mods I did similar times to yours with even slightly higher trap speeds.

Cheers,
agreed with Paul. I have Trapped 102mph in my car with out a bolt being touched on the motor.
Post Reply