T 465 E
-
blackbeauty99
- SLE Member
- Posts: 55
- Joined: Thu Jan 02, 2014 8:41 pm
- Year and Trim: 1999 Bonneville SLE 3800 N/A
T 465 E
been reading around on the forum...question, whats the main problem with a T 465 E?
-
nos4blood70
- Certified Bonneville Nut
- Posts: 9522
- Joined: Mon May 10, 2010 6:11 pm
- Year and Trim: 2003 SLE
- Location: Chicago, IL
Re: T 465 E
They have a couple of common issues, and they don't like much over factory power.
Other than that, with regular maintenance and responsible driving, they are a great transmission. Especially when you consider they haul around ~2 tons of FWD metal with a motor that produces torque basically off of idle.
Other than that, with regular maintenance and responsible driving, they are a great transmission. Especially when you consider they haul around ~2 tons of FWD metal with a motor that produces torque basically off of idle.
-Car Guy Carl
"Penelope" - 2003 SLE - 250k Miles
"Sydney" - 2000 Honda S2000 - 101k miles
"Penelope" - 2003 SLE - 250k Miles
"Sydney" - 2000 Honda S2000 - 101k miles
-
blackbeauty99
- SLE Member
- Posts: 55
- Joined: Thu Jan 02, 2014 8:41 pm
- Year and Trim: 1999 Bonneville SLE 3800 N/A
Re: T 465 E
all Im planning on my SLE Is a larger TB...and its got a gutted airbox..so actually this trans is an improvement over the old T460 EH?
-
blackbeauty99
- SLE Member
- Posts: 55
- Joined: Thu Jan 02, 2014 8:41 pm
- Year and Trim: 1999 Bonneville SLE 3800 N/A
Re: T 465 E
IM a pretty easy driver id say, I like the occasional kick in the pants now and then...
-
nos4blood70
- Certified Bonneville Nut
- Posts: 9522
- Joined: Mon May 10, 2010 6:11 pm
- Year and Trim: 2003 SLE
- Location: Chicago, IL
Re: T 465 E
Larger TB is pointless, your car will run worse because it will be breathing in unmetered air. You need a MAF retune for a larger TB if I am not mistaken, and even then on an NA I doubt you would even notice a difference.
The 4T60 was vacuum operated, and most regard the 4T65 as the superior transmission.
The 4T60 was vacuum operated, and most regard the 4T65 as the superior transmission.
-Car Guy Carl
"Penelope" - 2003 SLE - 250k Miles
"Sydney" - 2000 Honda S2000 - 101k miles
"Penelope" - 2003 SLE - 250k Miles
"Sydney" - 2000 Honda S2000 - 101k miles
-
bs009
- Posts like an LN3
- Posts: 573
- Joined: Thu May 22, 2008 3:53 pm
- Year and Trim: 82 GP
- Location: Nashville, TN
Re: T 465 E
4T65e is stronger, 4t60e is better for a DD IMO.
4T65e's develop pressure control solenoid issues around 150,000 miles and are prone to 4th gear shaft failure.
4T60e's tend to run too hot. Most of their failures are because of this.
Every 4t60e car I've had has gone well over 200,000 miles on the stock transmission with a trans cooler and regular changes.
Every 4t65e car I've had has needed a rebuild because of either the PCS or the 4th gear shaft.
4T65e's develop pressure control solenoid issues around 150,000 miles and are prone to 4th gear shaft failure.
4T60e's tend to run too hot. Most of their failures are because of this.
Every 4t60e car I've had has gone well over 200,000 miles on the stock transmission with a trans cooler and regular changes.
Every 4t65e car I've had has needed a rebuild because of either the PCS or the 4th gear shaft.
2009 Chevy Silverado 2500HD crew cab, 6.0, Z71. The project mover.
2002 Regal GS: 3.4 pulley, E85, and quicker than my old 99
1982 Pontiac Grand Prix L67, T56, GT45, T56, Holley EFI; It's pretty quick Mod list here
-
gonzo4191
- Certified Bonneville Nut
- Posts: 2616
- Joined: Wed May 21, 2008 9:52 pm
- Year and Trim: 91 S10 P/U
97 SSEI- 136k - Location: round lake beach, IL
- Contact:
Re: T 465 E
the larger throttle body requires a l67 maf table if that's what your going to use.does give you a lresponse boost
-Juan
No bonnie!
93 s10 ex cab: 2.8: t5: exhaust: tbi mods. 5.3, 76mm, and a D.r cam on a stand
No bonnie!
93 s10 ex cab: 2.8: t5: exhaust: tbi mods. 5.3, 76mm, and a D.r cam on a stand
-
nos4blood70
- Certified Bonneville Nut
- Posts: 9522
- Joined: Mon May 10, 2010 6:11 pm
- Year and Trim: 2003 SLE
- Location: Chicago, IL
Re: T 465 E
Get an intake instead. Don't waste your money on the TB.
-Car Guy Carl
"Penelope" - 2003 SLE - 250k Miles
"Sydney" - 2000 Honda S2000 - 101k miles
"Penelope" - 2003 SLE - 250k Miles
"Sydney" - 2000 Honda S2000 - 101k miles
-
00Beast
- Retired Site Developer
- Posts: 20960
- Joined: Tue May 27, 2008 10:30 pm
- Year and Trim: '17 Silverado 1500
- Location: MN/IA
- Contact:
Re: T 465 E
I agree. Larger TB is worthless until it becomes the bottleneck in the system. It's nowhere close right now.
Bye Bye:
RIP sandrock
RIP sandrock
Sirius wrote:Think about it. You’re tooling down the road in your Prius, knowing full-well that this thing being green is as big a sham as federally mandated ethanol-enriched gas, Russia pulling out of Ukraine, and Obamacare.
-
blackbeauty99
- SLE Member
- Posts: 55
- Joined: Thu Jan 02, 2014 8:41 pm
- Year and Trim: 1999 Bonneville SLE 3800 N/A
Re: T 465 E
im way past the 150,000 mile mark..173 K now...needs the fluid changed....my speedo is off by a little bit, is it possible that the trans has been rebuilt?