Mustang 289 vs 231 Bonneville
- spoiledred94
- Posts like a Northstar

- Posts: 1844
- Joined: Thu May 22, 2008 8:52 pm
- Year and Trim: Black 2001 Bonneville SSEi
- Location: Pacific Northwest
Mustang 289 vs 231 Bonneville
How does a 231 3.8 do against a Mustang 289?
2001 Bonneville SSEi. 1598xx mi.
great car. Wrecked


Burnt Bonny.
Note if you pull the injectors to obserbe fuel delivery...make sure you leave the plugs in and disconnect the ign. Believe me
great car. Wrecked


Burnt Bonny.
Note if you pull the injectors to obserbe fuel delivery...make sure you leave the plugs in and disconnect the ign. Believe me
- harofreak00
- Administrator

- Posts: 26022
- Joined: Mon May 19, 2008 6:04 pm
- Year and Trim: 2004 GXP - plus a handful of other Bonnevilles
- Location: Browerville, MN
- Contact:
Re: Mustang 289 vs 231 Bonneville
Which 231? There is like a 100hp difference between the LN3 and the L32.
Andrew - owner/operator of Bonnevilles Unlimited

2004 Bonneville GXP | 60k | White Gold Tricoat | custom built supercharged 3800 hot rod | garage queen
1997 Corvette | 57k | Silver Metallic | Z06 wheels | Date-night Hauler/Parts runner
2014 Town & Country Limited | Cashmere Pearl | 115k | Family Hauler
2002 Ram 1500 Quad Cab Sport | Black| 280k | Official Bonneville Hauler

2004 Bonneville GXP | 60k | White Gold Tricoat | custom built supercharged 3800 hot rod | garage queen
1997 Corvette | 57k | Silver Metallic | Z06 wheels | Date-night Hauler/Parts runner
2014 Town & Country Limited | Cashmere Pearl | 115k | Family Hauler
2002 Ram 1500 Quad Cab Sport | Black| 280k | Official Bonneville Hauler
- spoiledred94
- Posts like a Northstar

- Posts: 1844
- Joined: Thu May 22, 2008 8:52 pm
- Year and Trim: Black 2001 Bonneville SSEi
- Location: Pacific Northwest
Re: Mustang 289 vs 231 Bonneville
Neither. I meant my Seereis I NA
2001 Bonneville SSEi. 1598xx mi.
great car. Wrecked


Burnt Bonny.
Note if you pull the injectors to obserbe fuel delivery...make sure you leave the plugs in and disconnect the ign. Believe me
great car. Wrecked


Burnt Bonny.
Note if you pull the injectors to obserbe fuel delivery...make sure you leave the plugs in and disconnect the ign. Believe me
-
94SilverSSEi
- Certified Bonneville Nut

- Posts: 3351
- Joined: Thu May 22, 2008 11:14 pm
- Year and Trim: 97.2 40th SLE
68 w/400
94 SSEi - Location: Racine, Wisconsin
Re: Mustang 289 vs 231 Bonneville
Another big difference, are you saying mustang vs Bonneville?
Or theoretically either engine in the Bonneville?
Or theoretically either engine in the Bonneville?
Clay
1997.2 40th SLE-138k
1968 Bonneville 400ci w/TH-400-40k
1999 GMC Suburban SLT-191k
2005 Escalade 253k-GINA
1997.2 40th SLE-138k
1968 Bonneville 400ci w/TH-400-40k
1999 GMC Suburban SLT-191k
2005 Escalade 253k-GINA
nos4blood70 wrote:Literally, cars are drugs.
- spoiledred94
- Posts like a Northstar

- Posts: 1844
- Joined: Thu May 22, 2008 8:52 pm
- Year and Trim: Black 2001 Bonneville SSEi
- Location: Pacific Northwest
Re: Mustang 289 vs 231 Bonneville
Both honestly. Can a lightly modded bonneville come in with a better 1/4 mile time than a lightly modded mustang? And what's the top speed off the showroom floor without limiters?
2001 Bonneville SSEi. 1598xx mi.
great car. Wrecked


Burnt Bonny.
Note if you pull the injectors to obserbe fuel delivery...make sure you leave the plugs in and disconnect the ign. Believe me
great car. Wrecked


Burnt Bonny.
Note if you pull the injectors to obserbe fuel delivery...make sure you leave the plugs in and disconnect the ign. Believe me
- crash93ssei
- Retired Moderator

- Posts: 7671
- Joined: Mon May 19, 2008 6:08 pm
- Year and Trim: 2002 SE
- Location: Midland, Michigan
Re: Mustang 289 vs 231 Bonneville
What year is the mustang / 289? That makes a difference too. Also, what gearing in the rear axle of the mustang as well as what transmission?
Ryan

2003 Bonneville SSEi - The Black Mirror SOLD!
2002 Bonneville SE - The Mutt Complete 2004 SLE interior, drivetrain, and body harness swap, ECC swap, HUD swap, black GXP wheels, GXP headlights and tinted tails - SOLD
2003 BMW 540i M Sport, 2001 BMW X5 4.4i, 2010 GMC Acadia, 2017 Grand Design Imagine 3150BH
1982 Cutlass Supreme - The fun one

2003 Bonneville SSEi - The Black Mirror SOLD!
2002 Bonneville SE - The Mutt Complete 2004 SLE interior, drivetrain, and body harness swap, ECC swap, HUD swap, black GXP wheels, GXP headlights and tinted tails - SOLD
2003 BMW 540i M Sport, 2001 BMW X5 4.4i, 2010 GMC Acadia, 2017 Grand Design Imagine 3150BH
1982 Cutlass Supreme - The fun one
MattStrike wrote:It was the worst week of my life! *pause, drinks beer... smiles* But I'm better now!
-
01bonneSC
- Certified Bonneville Nut

- Posts: 4938
- Joined: Sat May 24, 2008 5:18 pm
- Year and Trim: 05 Chevy 'Hoe
1997 'maro (3.8L M5)
89 SkiDoo - Location: Sycamore, IL
Re: Mustang 289 vs 231 Bonneville
K code 289? That's 271hp. Most run of the mills 289s were 210hp. What all has been done to the 289? We need more info here man. Or better yet.......just run them at the track!
-
1oldman
- Certified Bonneville Nut

- Posts: 3975
- Joined: Tue May 04, 2010 11:21 pm
- Year and Trim: 2017 Hyundai Santa Fe Sport
- Location: Lone Star State
Re: Mustang 289 vs 231 Bonneville
with a video to post. - BC01bonneSC wrote:K code 289? That's 271hp. Most run of the mills 289s were 210hp. What all has been done to the 289? We need more info here man. Or better yet.......just run them at the track!
In Memory of Brad - 1/21/1977 .. 10/23/2013 ...... Aaron - 1977 .. 2017 .....
2017 Hyundai Santa Fe Sport ..... 1992 Bonneville SSE 1SB 170 HP L27 4T60E retired/sold to MattStrike ..... 2005 Bonneville SE 1SC 205 HP L36 4T65E - retired/salvage yard ..... PBCF user 2321
2017 Hyundai Santa Fe Sport ..... 1992 Bonneville SSE 1SB 170 HP L27 4T60E retired/sold to MattStrike ..... 2005 Bonneville SE 1SC 205 HP L36 4T65E - retired/salvage yard ..... PBCF user 2321
-
Bonneville92V688
- Certified Bonneville Nut

- Posts: 5103
- Joined: Tue May 20, 2008 9:03 am
- Year and Trim: ‘12 Jeep Grand Cherokee Overland Summit
- Location: NE Ohio Original join date - March 2006
Re: Mustang 289 vs 231 Bonneville
Modified or stock? Even a 289 can dish out a can of whoop a$$ when properly modded.
BTW, For those that don't know, the 289 is nothing more than a 302 with a shorter stroke....I believe it's 2.8 or 2.9.
BTW, For those that don't know, the 289 is nothing more than a 302 with a shorter stroke....I believe it's 2.8 or 2.9.
2012 Grand Cherokee Overland Summit - Hemi
1996 Thunderbird LX - 3.8
1996 Thunderbird LX - 3.8
-
01bonneSC
- Certified Bonneville Nut

- Posts: 4938
- Joined: Sat May 24, 2008 5:18 pm
- Year and Trim: 05 Chevy 'Hoe
1997 'maro (3.8L M5)
89 SkiDoo - Location: Sycamore, IL
Re: Mustang 289 vs 231 Bonneville
Technically a 302 is just a 289 with a longer stroke. 289 came firstBonneville92V688 wrote:Modified or stock? Even a 289 can dish out a can of whoop a$$ when properly modded.
BTW, For those that don't know, the 289 is nothing more than a 302 with a shorter stroke....I believe it's 2.8 or 2.9.
289
289 Windsor V8 in a 1965 Ford Mustang
The 289 cu in (4.7 L) Windsor was also introduced in 1963. Bore was expanded to 4.0 in (102 mm), becoming the standard bore for most factory Windsor engines. The 289 weighed 506 lb (230 kg).
In 1963 the 289 was available in two forms: with a two-barrel carburetor and 8.7:1 compression, (SAE gross) rated at 195 hp (145 kW) @ 4400 rpm and 258 lb·ft (350 N·m) @ 2200 rpm. The two-barrel 289 replaced the 260 as the base V8 for full-sized Fords. The second form was the K-code listed below, in 1963 it was available only in the Fairlane.
In 1964 with a four-barrel carburetor and 9.0:1 compression, rated at 210 hp (157 kW) @ 4400 rpm and 300 lb·ft (407 N·m) @ 2800 rpm was available in Mercury Comets.
1964 1/2 (Early 1965) Mustang 289 D-Code 4v Engine - The D Code V8 Mustang engine with the Autolite 4bll carburetor was a rare engine. It was only offered as an option in the 1964 1/2 (Early 1965) Mustangs dated March - September 1964. Some characteristics setting the rare engine apart from other earlier V8s include:
The air cleaner decal was black, white and red in color (rather than black and orange). It read “289 cubic inch 4-V premium fuel”.
The timing chain cover had three variations:
an oil filler neck;
a hole for an oil filler neck with a plug in it;
no oil filler neck or oil filler hole.
All D Code engines used an aluminum water pump.
D Code 289’s used an Autolite 4100 4V 1.08 Venturi carburetor.
D Code 289’s had 5 bolt holes for attaching the bell housing (later engines had 6 bolts).
Early D Codes utilized a generator and later D Codes utilized an alternator.
Both 1963 and 1964 versions had a five-bolt bell housing pattern that was different from later six-bolt units (Mustangs switched bolt patterns around August 3, 1964).
For 1965 the compression ratio of the base 289 was raised to 9.3:1, increasing power and torque to 200 hp (149 kW) @ 4400 rpm and 282 lb·ft (382 N·m) @ 2400 rpm. The four-barrel version was increased to 10.0:1 compression, and was rated at 225 hp (168 kW) @ 4800 rpm and 305 lb·ft (414 N·m) @ 3200 rpm.
Engine specifications were unchanged for 1966 and 1967. In 1968 the four-barrel 225 hp (168 kW) engine was dropped, leaving only the two-barrel — now reduced back to 195 hp (145 kW).The HiPo 271 H.P. engine was also dropped, making room for the new for 1968 302 V-8. 1968 was the last year of production for the 289 in the U.S.
The 289 was also the engine for the first Ford Falcon GT, the XR GT. (Australia)
[edit]289 "HiPo" (K-code)
Ford 289 K-code engine in a Shelby GT 350. Note that the radiator hose connects to the intake manifold, a telltale Windsor feature.
A high-performance version of the 289 engine was introduced late in the 1963 model year as a special order for Ford Fairlanes. The engine is informally known as the "HiPo" or the K-code (after the engine letter used in the VIN of cars so equipped). Oddly, this engine was introduced in 1963 as the only 289 engine available in the intermediate Fairlanes. Lesser powered cars had the 260 engine in that year. Starting in June 1964, it became an option for the Mustang. NOTE: K-code Mercury Comets were the 210 HP 4 bbl carb engine not the High Performance engine as the K-code Fords.
The HiPo engine was engineered to increase performance and high-RPM reliability over standard 289 fare. It had solid lifters with hotter cam timing; 10.5:1 compression; a dual point, centrifugal advance distributor; smaller combustion chamber heads with cast spring cups and screw-in studs; low restriction exhaust manifolds; and a bigger, manual choke 595 CFM carburetor (std 289 4v was 480 CFM). The water pump, fuel pump, and alternator/generator pulley were altered; fewer vanes, extra spring, and larger diameter respectively; to help handle the higher RPMs. Even the HiPo’s fan was unique. Bottom end improvements included thicker main bearing caps and balancer, larger diameter rod bolts, and a hardness tested and counterweighted crankshaft, all for high-rpm reliability. The HiPo carried SAE gross ratings of 271 hp (202 kW) @ 6000 rpm and 312 lb·ft (423 N·m) @ 3400 rpm.
The HiPo engine was used in modified form by Carroll Shelby for the 1965-1967 Shelby GT350, raising rated power to 306 hp (228 kW) @ 6000 rpm through use of special exhaust headers, an aluminum intake manifold, and a larger carburetor. The Shelby engine also had a larger oil pan with baffles to reduce oil starvation in hard cornering. Shelby also replaced the internal front press-in oil gallery plugs with a screw-in type plug to reduce chances of failure.
From 1966 to 1968, Shelby offered an optional Paxton supercharger for the 289, raising its power (on Shelby GT350s) to around 390 hp (291 kW).
The K-code HiPo engine was an expensive option and its popularity was greatly diminished after the 390 and 428 big-block engines became available in the Mustang and Fairlane lines, which offered similar power (at the expense of greater weight) for far less cost.
-
00Beast
- Retired Site Developer

- Posts: 20960
- Joined: Tue May 27, 2008 10:30 pm
- Year and Trim: '17 Silverado 1500
- Location: MN/IA
- Contact:
Re: Mustang 289 vs 231 Bonneville
Mustang is smaller, lighter and has the right drive axle. He's low 15's at worst and you're low 16's at best, so you'd probably get whooped.
Bye Bye:

RIP sandrock

RIP sandrock
Sirius wrote:Think about it. You’re tooling down the road in your Prius, knowing full-well that this thing being green is as big a sham as federally mandated ethanol-enriched gas, Russia pulling out of Ukraine, and Obamacare.
-
01bonneSC
- Certified Bonneville Nut

- Posts: 4938
- Joined: Sat May 24, 2008 5:18 pm
- Year and Trim: 05 Chevy 'Hoe
1997 'maro (3.8L M5)
89 SkiDoo - Location: Sycamore, IL
Re: Mustang 289 vs 231 Bonneville
Depends on what year mustand but the 64-66 were mid 14s with the K code 289.
EDIT: I should say with 4.11s(which were optional) and slicks.
EDIT: I should say with 4.11s(which were optional) and slicks.
Last edited by 01bonneSC on Fri Mar 09, 2012 6:22 pm, edited 1 time in total.
- SSEi95
- Site Owner/Webmaster

- Posts: 7005
- Joined: Sun May 18, 2008 10:53 pm
- Year and Trim: 2002 SSEi
'01 Sierra C3 - Location: Minneapolis, MN
- Contact:
Re: Mustang 289 vs 231 Bonneville
Not much help here, but I can say from experience.... a 1995 ssei is considerably faster than a late 90's v6 stang with a manual.
didn't do as well against the later v8 Bullit clone he had though. 
- spoiledred94
- Posts like a Northstar

- Posts: 1844
- Joined: Thu May 22, 2008 8:52 pm
- Year and Trim: Black 2001 Bonneville SSEi
- Location: Pacific Northwest
Re: Mustang 289 vs 231 Bonneville
well I could hope to take a stock one (I don't see 210 hp too far off for my car). Just depends on the start. This brilliant red 65 scoured past. lift kit, nice bite and good rubber.
2001 Bonneville SSEi. 1598xx mi.
great car. Wrecked


Burnt Bonny.
Note if you pull the injectors to obserbe fuel delivery...make sure you leave the plugs in and disconnect the ign. Believe me
great car. Wrecked


Burnt Bonny.
Note if you pull the injectors to obserbe fuel delivery...make sure you leave the plugs in and disconnect the ign. Believe me
- *B2*
- Posts like an L36

- Posts: 937
- Joined: Thu May 22, 2008 8:07 pm
- Year and Trim: 2000 SLE - Black
- Location: Alton, IL
Re: Mustang 289 vs 231 Bonneville
You'd probably be fine against most since they're older and the carb and ignition are outdated and likely out of tune. But...if the guy knows what he's doing, those are in tune, and he's modified the engine somewhat, I think you'll be on the short end. Most Mustangs that old have had a cam and exhaust added somewhere along the line. Definitely not all, but a lot.
From a guy with a '66 with a lightly modded 289 (not running, so I don't know it's time).
From a guy with a '66 with a lightly modded 289 (not running, so I don't know it's time).
Last edited by *B2* on Sat Mar 10, 2012 10:33 am, edited 2 times in total.
Black 2000 SLE



