FWI vs. K&N

Talk about modifications, or anything else associated with performance enhancements. Have a new idea for performance/reliability? Post it here. No idea is stupid! (please use Detailing and Appearance for cosmetic ideas)
Post Reply
Kitt99
SE Member
SE Member
Posts: 22
Joined: Sun Nov 13, 2011 1:07 am
Year and Trim: 1999 Pontiac Bonneville SE

FWI vs. K&N

Post by Kitt99 »

I have a 99 Bonnie SE, and idk what i should do. Because my engine is N/A am I better off by just throwing in a K&N filter? or will i see a little better performance with an Intense FWI? I don't mind the extra work with the FWI.

P.S. with the location of the FWI will I risk water locking my motor? This car is my DD and i drive it through everything.

Thanks!
Bing
Posts like an L36
Posts like an L36
Posts: 1040
Joined: Fri Dec 24, 2010 1:28 pm
Year and Trim: S

Re: FWI vs. K&N

Post by Bing »

The accordion tube that connects the filter box to the throttle body is the restriction/turbulence in the stock set up (down stream of a gutted air box).

Heres what I did with my car. It is also a DD, so the filter has seen rain and snow, and I have not had one problem with it. As long as you don't drive through puddles that are 1 1/2' deep there is no risk of hydro locking your motor.
You will notice the difference in sound (especially at start up) and it will seem a little more lively.

viewtopic.php?f=12&t=23155


This picture shows the filters placement in the fender well.
Image




If you're not sure about doing a FWI, I have a gutted air box I'll sell you for the cost of shipping just PM me.
Last edited by Bing on Fri Dec 30, 2011 6:07 am, edited 1 time in total.
User avatar
WhiteArrow3800
Moderator / Social Dev
Moderator / Social Dev
Posts: 5962
Joined: Tue May 20, 2008 11:52 pm
Year and Trim: ___
2001 Bonneville SSEi
2009 Pontiac G8 GT
Location: Williamsburg, Va

Re: FWI vs. K&N

Post by WhiteArrow3800 »

Ditto with above. Pretty much if water makes it to the filter, you shouldn't have been driving in it to begin with. I've got an Intense FWI on both the '93 and '01. Both cars are DD's and as pictured above, the filter is exposed and keeps relatively clean...and the '93 currently commutes out to northern West Virginia every week (6 hours from here) and it's seen a lot of rain, snow, salt and mud in the last few weeks.
Image
'93 SSE "Guinevere" RIP 1993 - 2019
'01 SSEi "Chloe" Mods: Intense FWI | GenV | WBS Intercooled | 3.2 MPS | 1.9 YT Rockers | SSAC Headers | N* TB | TEP Trans | 3.29 FDR | Torsen LSD
DTM Tuned | Dual AeroForce | Solid Mounts | 255 Walbro Pump | Fuel Logs | GXP STB & Sway Bars | CSS Lowering Springs | GXP Brakes | Disabled DRL
Magnaflow Mufflers | Magnaflow Cat | GXP Seats & Trim | 35 % Tint | Cleared & Tinted Tails | repinS Retrofited Morimoto Mini H1 | 19" GT500 Wheels
'09 G8 GT "Abigail" Mods: Rotofab | LS3 Heads, Intake & Cam | Kooks LT | Solo Exhaust | Tien Springs w/ GXP Struts | Whiteline Swaybars | BMR Subframe Connectors
Achievements: Guinevere - 264k mi | 16.27 @ 84.10mph | March '11 COTM :: Chloe - 223k mi | 13.85 @ 102mph | January '09 COTM :: Abigail - 192k mi | 12.85 @ 112mph
User avatar
willwren
Retired Admin
Retired Admin
Posts: 65489
Joined: Sun May 18, 2008 11:07 pm
Year and Trim: .
93 SSEi
95 SLE (SC)
97 Buick LeSabre
Location: Oregon WCBF'04, '05, '06, '07, '08, '09, '10, '11 Survivor
Contact:

Re: FWI vs. K&N

Post by willwren »

Nobody here (at least hundreds running the FWI) has ever had a water issue. The 92-99 run it lower than the 2k it was designed for, and I've never had an issue, nor has anyone else. You have bigger problems if you're that deep. You'd have to be in 18" or more of water and moving very slow for it to happen, and the motor would likely stall for lack of air before it sucked any water in.
Image
Click here for mod list for both cars
93 SSEi, 95 SLE (supercharged) 97 Buick LeSabre Limited
PontiacDad at WCBF '04: Cruise control? That's like surrendering!
Comprehensive guide to troubleshooting, rebuilding, and modifying Eaton Superchargers
User avatar
BonneMe
Certified Bonneville Nut
Certified Bonneville Nut
Posts: 11879
Joined: Tue May 20, 2008 10:45 am
Year and Trim: 2001 BMW 330i
ZSP Sport Pack
Moonroof
Location: Eagan, MN

Re: FWI vs. K&N

Post by BonneMe »

Physical damage is more of a concern than water damage.
Jason Z - Exposed Autos
Image
2001 BMW 330i
- Titanium Silver - Sport Package - 3 Pedals - Koni Yellow/H&R Sport
2006 Volkswagen GTI - (gone) Tornado Red - DSG, Stage II~280hp/325tq
1993 Pontiac Bonneville - (gone) Purple Pearl H4U/SLE. Loud
00Beast
Retired Site Developer
Retired Site Developer
Posts: 20960
Joined: Tue May 27, 2008 10:30 pm
Year and Trim: '17 Silverado 1500
Location: MN/IA
Contact:

Re: FWI vs. K&N

Post by 00Beast »

:stupid:

Water isn't an issue unless you drive through 2' of open water, and submerge the filter.
Bye Bye:
Image
RIP sandrock
Sirius wrote:Think about it. You’re tooling down the road in your Prius, knowing full-well that this thing being green is as big a sham as federally mandated ethanol-enriched gas, Russia pulling out of Ukraine, and Obamacare.
User avatar
nos4blood70
Certified Bonneville Nut
Certified Bonneville Nut
Posts: 9522
Joined: Mon May 10, 2010 6:11 pm
Year and Trim: 2003 SLE
Location: Chicago, IL

Re: FWI vs. K&N

Post by nos4blood70 »

:withstupid:

Even if this mod did nothing for performance, I'd do it just for the sound of the engine. :twisted:
-Car Guy Carl
"Penelope" - 2003 SLE - 250k Miles
"Sydney" - 2000 Honda S2000 - 101k miles
Image
User avatar
SSEiMan01
Certified Bonneville Nut
Certified Bonneville Nut
Posts: 5766
Joined: Sun Dec 05, 2010 6:17 pm
Year and Trim: .
92 SSE
92 Lumina Z34
99 Tahoe
03 PAU
Location: DeKalb, IL

Re: FWI vs. K&N

Post by SSEiMan01 »

nos4blood70 wrote::withstupid:

Even if this mod did nothing for performance, I'd do it just for the sound of the engine. :twisted:
:withstupid: I get the vacuum cleaner reaction a lot, even more now that it's cold out. It's cool to hear it go from Shop-Vac to Whine...lol
Will
91 Riviera | S2 L67 Swap/4T60E | 127K mi | Antelope Met. w/ Tan Int. | Saved From Death By Crusher
92 Bonneville SSE | L67/4T60E | 77K mi | Med Slate Grey w/ Two-Tone Grey Int. | Low Miles Time Capsule
92 Lumina Z34 | LQ1/4T60E | 177k mi | Torch Red w/Grey Int. | Rusty In Odd Spots
99 Tahoe LT | L31/4L65E | 276k mi | Spiral Grey Metallic w/Grey Int. | Truck for Truck Things and Portable Concert Hall
02 Bonneville SSEi | 171k mi | Black w/Neutral Int. | Backup and road trip car
03 Park Avenue Ultra | 212K mi | White Diamond Met. w/ Shale Int. | Southern Time Capsule
05 Acura RL | 165K mi | Carbon Grey Pearl w/Ebony Int. | The Super-Hooptie Daily

James May wrote:Hello.
User avatar
nos4blood70
Certified Bonneville Nut
Certified Bonneville Nut
Posts: 9522
Joined: Mon May 10, 2010 6:11 pm
Year and Trim: 2003 SLE
Location: Chicago, IL

Re: FWI vs. K&N

Post by nos4blood70 »

Not a fan of the vacuum cleaner sound..
But the way she roars past 3k RPM. :)
-Car Guy Carl
"Penelope" - 2003 SLE - 250k Miles
"Sydney" - 2000 Honda S2000 - 101k miles
Image
Post Reply