Turbo on a 95 L67

Talk about modifications, or anything else associated with performance enhancements. Have a new idea for performance/reliability? Post it here. No idea is stupid! (please use Detailing and Appearance for cosmetic ideas)
Post Reply
irocjoecool
LE Member
Posts: 6
Joined: Tue Apr 27, 2010 8:10 pm
Year and Trim: 1987 Pontiac Fiero GT
95 3800 S/C 97 4T60E

Turbo on a 95 L67

Post by irocjoecool »

I have a 95 Riviera L67 in my 87 Fiero. Several people in the Fiero world have had amazing results from turbo Series 2 engines. I would like to ditch my s/c and run an NA intake. I would also be intercooling the system.
What are the power limitations of a Series 1? Fieros with turbo Series 2 engines are getting north of 450whp.
User avatar
willwren
Retired Admin
Retired Admin
Posts: 65489
Joined: Sun May 18, 2008 11:07 pm
Year and Trim: .
93 SSEi
95 SLE (SC)
97 Buick LeSabre
Location: Oregon WCBF'04, '05, '06, '07, '08, '09, '10, '11 Survivor
Contact:

Re: Turbo on a 95 L67

Post by willwren »

That's a very interesting question best answered by the differences between the motors.

The Series 1 has heavier internals and doesn't rev out as high in each gear. It's more of a torque motor. You won't gain the same net horsepower mod for mod, but will gain more torque than the Series 2 mod for mod. In a light car like a fiero, this could prove difficult to launch and drive.

If you go that route, I'd be looking at a larger turbo to spool later to save your tires. Remove the nosedrive and rotors, and machine a blockoff plate for that end of the blower to use as your housing, not an NA intake. The only NA intake system that will fit your block and heads is an L27, and it's far too restricted with a tiny little throttle body. Your current throttle plate is already larger than that of the Series 2 L67, making your M62 housing and stock TB more ideal for an intake.

Series 1 L67's are probably (in general) a bit stronger than the S2 L67 in terms of stoutness and durability. You're just not going to get 450hp if you copy the S2 car that achieved that same goal. Probably 400-425 mod-for-mod. You will have more torque though, peaking at a lower RPM and staying flatter across the curve than the same S2.

EDIT:

I just saw your profile. You'd be best served getting a better trans than that 4T60. You'll need something stouter. Why didn't you stick with the HD the L67 was originally bolted to? I'm assuming you changed your shift points and gear ratios?
Last edited by willwren on Wed Nov 30, 2011 8:24 am, edited 1 time in total.
Image
Click here for mod list for both cars
93 SSEi, 95 SLE (supercharged) 97 Buick LeSabre Limited
PontiacDad at WCBF '04: Cruise control? That's like surrendering!
Comprehensive guide to troubleshooting, rebuilding, and modifying Eaton Superchargers
irocjoecool
LE Member
Posts: 6
Joined: Tue Apr 27, 2010 8:10 pm
Year and Trim: 1987 Pontiac Fiero GT
95 3800 S/C 97 4T60E

Re: Turbo on a 95 L67

Post by irocjoecool »

The 95 Rivi trans is a non-hd 4T60
User avatar
willwren
Retired Admin
Retired Admin
Posts: 65489
Joined: Sun May 18, 2008 11:07 pm
Year and Trim: .
93 SSEi
95 SLE (SC)
97 Buick LeSabre
Location: Oregon WCBF'04, '05, '06, '07, '08, '09, '10, '11 Survivor
Contact:

Re: Turbo on a 95 L67

Post by willwren »

Not true. If it came under the L67, it's actually a 2.97 ratio HD trans, by use of a 3.33 ratio differential which is quite a bit more beefy than the standard 4T60's diff, and larger diameter axles. While not 'tagged' or otherwise identified as an HD, it was in fact so. The axle ratio is the giveaway clue.

Non-supercharged got the 3.05 axle ratio just like the H-bodies on this Forum, and the L67 equipped 95 Rivieras got the 2.97 ratio, just like both the 93 and 95 L67's that I own (in H bodies).

If you didn't account for this, and you're using the Riv PCM in stock tune, your shift points are wrong for that 97 4T60E, which is very likely a 3.06 ratio.
Last edited by willwren on Wed Nov 30, 2011 11:39 am, edited 1 time in total.
Image
Click here for mod list for both cars
93 SSEi, 95 SLE (supercharged) 97 Buick LeSabre Limited
PontiacDad at WCBF '04: Cruise control? That's like surrendering!
Comprehensive guide to troubleshooting, rebuilding, and modifying Eaton Superchargers
irocjoecool
LE Member
Posts: 6
Joined: Tue Apr 27, 2010 8:10 pm
Year and Trim: 1987 Pontiac Fiero GT
95 3800 S/C 97 4T60E

Re: Turbo on a 95 L67

Post by irocjoecool »

Ryan Glick did my tune and did account for the ratio change. The trans is from a 97 3x00 Grand Am. The Rivi trans was shot and the GA trans was free.
Jrs3800
Retired Admin/Techinfo Admin
Retired Admin/Techinfo Admin
Posts: 26009
Joined: Mon May 19, 2008 2:08 pm
Year and Trim: 03 SLE, 95 SE, 95 TS SE
Location: Space Coast, or at least it used to be

Re: Turbo on a 95 L67

Post by Jrs3800 »

Ok just to make a note here.... 95 was a freak year for a lot of different things in GM....

Do you still have that 95 Riv SC trans? 95 was an odd ball year, the 95 SC Bonnevilles got the 2.97 ratio trans using a 3.33 diff...

The 95 Riv if it had the original trans got the 2.93 overall ratio using a 3.29 HD Diff, but this diff is the only year to have a reverse fine pitch... It will only work in that trans and no other due to the ring gear... in 96 they changed the pitch again and then left it alone...lol...

If you do have that 95 Riv trans it should have the one off 3.29 HD Diff... This was the only car i know of to have this set up until 96 when the other Supercharged H and C bodies went to it...
User avatar
willwren
Retired Admin
Retired Admin
Posts: 65489
Joined: Sun May 18, 2008 11:07 pm
Year and Trim: .
93 SSEi
95 SLE (SC)
97 Buick LeSabre
Location: Oregon WCBF'04, '05, '06, '07, '08, '09, '10, '11 Survivor
Contact:

Re: Turbo on a 95 L67

Post by willwren »

Don, I'm finding conflicting info on that. I'm seeing 2.97 ratio for the 95 Riv.

In either case, the original Riv trans was stronger than any non-HD 60 would be, especially if your plans include a turbo and the 400hp range.
Image
Click here for mod list for both cars
93 SSEi, 95 SLE (supercharged) 97 Buick LeSabre Limited
PontiacDad at WCBF '04: Cruise control? That's like surrendering!
Comprehensive guide to troubleshooting, rebuilding, and modifying Eaton Superchargers
Jrs3800
Retired Admin/Techinfo Admin
Retired Admin/Techinfo Admin
Posts: 26009
Joined: Mon May 19, 2008 2:08 pm
Year and Trim: 03 SLE, 95 SE, 95 TS SE
Location: Space Coast, or at least it used to be

Re: Turbo on a 95 L67

Post by Jrs3800 »

I really need to find time to get better pics together... It seems what GM said they did and what they really did is not exactly correct...

The G body, NA 3800 used the 3.05 Diff, and the SC G body used the 3.29 diff for 1995( both of these being reverse fine pitch).. The 95 C and H body used the 3.33 diff for SC and 2.84 and or 3.06 for the NA( Regular pitch )...

1996 all of the SC C, H and G bodies all used the 3.29 Diff( fine pitch )


Its really screwed up how GM did all of this...

But here is the problem... There were regular pitch Diffs( 2.84, 3.06 and 3.33 ), then you had the Reverse fine pitch 1995 only 2.86, 3.05 and 3.29...

Then in 96 it was Regular fine pitch 2.86, 3.05 and 3.29... But the 96 fine pitch will not swap for a 95 reverse fine pitch or the other way around...

Now from what I can gather, the 2.84, 3.06 and 3.33 stayed a regular pitch and the last year for the regular pitch was 1997... 98+ is all fine pitch...

Only reason I have learned or had to learn this was due to the issues I was having finding the correct diff I was looking for.. GM really mixed it all up on this one...lol

The reason I was diving into his trans is that if he has this Riv Trans, he can also upgrade to the newer ring gear and run the 98+ 3.29 diff, and if it ever breaks he would have an easier time sourcing another... The 95 Riv trans was very one off..
Last edited by Jrs3800 on Wed Nov 30, 2011 3:22 pm, edited 1 time in total.
00Beast
Retired Site Developer
Retired Site Developer
Posts: 20960
Joined: Tue May 27, 2008 10:30 pm
Year and Trim: '17 Silverado 1500
Location: MN/IA
Contact:

Re: Turbo on a 95 L67

Post by 00Beast »

:stupid:

I'm trusting Don w/ this one, LOL.
Bye Bye:
Image
RIP sandrock
Sirius wrote:Think about it. You’re tooling down the road in your Prius, knowing full-well that this thing being green is as big a sham as federally mandated ethanol-enriched gas, Russia pulling out of Ukraine, and Obamacare.
User avatar
GonneVille
Certified Bonneville Nut
Certified Bonneville Nut
Posts: 3863
Joined: Tue May 20, 2008 7:07 pm
Year and Trim: 1998 Buick Park Avenue Ultra
Location: Galloway, Ohio IDDVI, MWBF05, NEBF06, CEBF06, ONBF06, NEBF07, ONBF07
Contact:

Re: Turbo on a 95 L67

Post by GonneVille »

Honestly, if I were building an L67 Fiero, Series 1 or Series 2, I'd drop the auto and put in a stick, either a Getrag 5spd, or the 6spd from the G6.

Fieros with big power are pretty twitchy in the corners, and a badly-timed shift from an auto could cause you serious grief. Unless you're only going to use this thing for commuting and drag-racing, manual is the way to go.
~Brian -- 98 Park Avenue Ultra-- DEFUNCT. Blew the rings in a front cylinder
Mods: Too *dang* many...Click the siggy...
13.87 @ 101.40mph, Kil-Kare Raceway, 10/15/09

Image
01bonneSC
Certified Bonneville Nut
Certified Bonneville Nut
Posts: 4938
Joined: Sat May 24, 2008 5:18 pm
Year and Trim: 05 Chevy 'Hoe
1997 'maro (3.8L M5)
89 SkiDoo
Location: Sycamore, IL

Re: Turbo on a 95 L67

Post by 01bonneSC »

GonneVille wrote:Honestly, if I were building an L67 Fiero, Series 1 or Series 2, I'd drop the auto and put in a stick, either a Getrag 5spd, or the 6spd from the G6.

Fieros with big power are pretty twitchy in the corners, and a badly-timed shift from an auto could cause you serious grief. Unless you're only going to use this thing for commuting and drag-racing, manual is the way to go.
I say manual is the ONLY way to go in a lil fire chicken. Much more driver input available and lighter.
Image
00Beast wrote:Less off-topic than Lane's Heated Steering wheel, but yeah, back to the topic.
ga93sle
Certified Bonneville Nut
Certified Bonneville Nut
Posts: 3967
Joined: Wed May 21, 2008 11:14 pm
Year and Trim: 06 Grand Prix LS4
Location: St Cloud, MN

Re: Turbo on a 95 L67

Post by ga93sle »

Not to mention just plain cooler...
*Chris*
Image
15 Nissan Altima 2.5SL/2004 Honda Shadow 750 Aero
Previous, 07 GP SE, 06 GP GXP, 97 SSE 40th, 96 LeSabre Custom, 93 SLE, 90 LeSabre Custom
User avatar
willwren
Retired Admin
Retired Admin
Posts: 65489
Joined: Sun May 18, 2008 11:07 pm
Year and Trim: .
93 SSEi
95 SLE (SC)
97 Buick LeSabre
Location: Oregon WCBF'04, '05, '06, '07, '08, '09, '10, '11 Survivor
Contact:

Re: Turbo on a 95 L67

Post by willwren »

In any case, the non-HD transmission is a bad formula for success if you're considering a Turbo. Regardless of FDR. You have the wrong transmission, plain and simple.
Image
Click here for mod list for both cars
93 SSEi, 95 SLE (supercharged) 97 Buick LeSabre Limited
PontiacDad at WCBF '04: Cruise control? That's like surrendering!
Comprehensive guide to troubleshooting, rebuilding, and modifying Eaton Superchargers
irocjoecool
LE Member
Posts: 6
Joined: Tue Apr 27, 2010 8:10 pm
Year and Trim: 1987 Pontiac Fiero GT
95 3800 S/C 97 4T60E

Re: Turbo on a 95 L67

Post by irocjoecool »

In the Fiero world, 5 speeds are generally slower and pretty fragile in high hp Fieros.
First gear is basically useless in the Isuzu and Getrag 5 speeds with higher-torque engines,.
Post Reply